Thread: FWD/FF Buggy
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 22-11-2011
Origineelreclamebord's Avatar
Origineelreclamebord Origineelreclamebord is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugle View Post
Cool project, always wanted to make a Ryuz replica but not being able to race it in 2WD class is a bummer
With the speeds cars go these days compared to when they got banned I can't see a FWD being faster than a RWD.
Well, considering they are some 20 years of development the RWDs got and the FWDs didn't, I doubt the FWDs will be nearly as fast. Given they would get enough development they may become more competitive. However, it's indeed likely the FWDs won't be able to keep up with RWDs like they did back then. Even more reason to let FWDs compete in the 2WD class again

I hope to drive it next season next to my TRF201 at a club, and hopefully I can even enter the FWD in a 2WD race or championship if it's not at a high level.

By the way, small update:



I changed the front suspension a bit: I decided to use DB01 suspension blocks at the rear. The reason is that I don't want the toe-out that the suspension arms get by using the TRF201 suspension blocks. Plus, it might give me extra space to move the steering rack further forward. I also made blanks for a low profile (Savox 1251MG geometry) servo and a stick pack (Team Orion 2S 4600mAh 45C LiPo) to explore the potential layouts for the chassis.

The current one I got pictured is what I have in mind. It won't deliver the greatest front weight balance, but it does allow me to move the battery backwards all the way to the rear suspension block if I need to. Plus, if it's necessary I can place under servo weights on the car I plan to use the steering rack fro a TLR 22 if they are durable enough (I got a thread about that in the Losi section) as they are so compact and simple.

Another thing I did was completing the structure of the gearbox. I hope it's accurate enough as it was hard to get good measurements on the critical mounting holes with some calipers and a set square. But after all it's much cheaper than having it run through a 3D scanner at a company for 100+ euros
Reply With Quote