Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > The PlayGround

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-06-2010
twisty's Avatar
twisty twisty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Leeds,West Yorkshire.
Posts: 637
Default

It was a racing incident,i don`t think either should be reprimanded,everyone wants to see close racing,it doesn`t get much closer than that hahaha! [shouldn`t laugh really but anyway]
Maybe they should be fitted with big rubber bumpers
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-06-2010
Shaun 'TheSheep' Atkinson's Avatar
Shaun 'TheSheep' Atkinson Shaun 'TheSheep' Atkinson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Place That Time Forgot
Posts: 631
Default

Yes i did!
__________________
PS3 GamerTag: ShaunX23


Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-06-2010
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by telboy View Post
I think all of this 'saving fuel' rubbish is a load of crap.

They're supposed to be fuelled to the end?! no?
Understandibly they want the cars to be as light as possible. But surely if you put a little bit more fuel in, then you can run the whole race with the engine turned up! Thus, being able to race flat out for the whole race!...and not have to slow down at a time when others could make a pass at the end of the race.
Every lap's-worth of fuel costs 1/10th of a second. Over the Turkish GP that's 5.8 seconds - a difference of first or fourth for those front four cars (without the crash!!). In Oz they fuelled the cars with about 165kg of fuel, and they ran flat out all race. By Turkey, they had 155kg of fuel, because that makes them faster over the race distance. Saving fuel isn't rubbish, it is part of the sport now, as it was before they had re-fuelling.

If you tell them to have full tanks, they'll just turn the engines up and use more fuel to make up the speed they need to overcome the weight, making them marginal on fuel by the end of the race. We're just back where we were 20 years ago, only this time we actually know what's going on because of the radios, and they have the technology to turn down the wick.

If you don't like this, best choose another sport to watch, as it's not going away any time soon!!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-06-2010
BagofSkill's Avatar
BagofSkill BagofSkill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 259
Default

Actually, on average a lap of fuel costs a bit over a tenth in qualifying, which is ofen critical for grid position. And with how hard overtaking is is important to get as high up the grid as you can.

But at the start of the race when you're fuel up to 160kg, each extra lap on full power costs a lot more laptime. Turning the engine down might cost 0.1-0.2 per lap, but then don't forget that the engine have to last 4 races these days, so you can't just go around running full power all the time. So if you know you can't run full power all race every race, and you know when you turn it down you save fuel, you see how it works hand in hand.

The other note about the turkey rae in particular was that unlike usual, these 4 guys were just about nose to tail (for the first 40 laps) so the didn't have time to relax and save the engine/fuel like they normally would when the leads is comfortable and the field is spread out, which is why they ran harder longer and then turning the engine down at the end became priority for both RB and McLaren.
__________________
Chris Papadopoulos

- Royal Racing Paint - <clicky>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com