Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Tamiya

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 08-09-2010
Matisse's Avatar
Matisse Matisse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 290
Default

that picture looks an awful lot like the pic of the new ansmann xpro4 te buggy, are we sure its actually a cad drawing of the 502?

seems unlike tamiya to release such a sketchy image.
__________________


PHULL PHAT - Phat Bodies
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-09-2010
CraigM's Avatar
CraigM CraigM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 38
Default

Looking forward to it. I really like the 511 but without those bling diff enclosures the open drivetrain can be a bit of a pain on dirt tracks like the ones we have here in oz.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 09-09-2010
muratti's Avatar
muratti muratti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria/EUROPE
Posts: 764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik Emilsson View Post
If you look at the new models, you donīt think Tamiya is trying to attract more customers?
They are not just making new models for current customers, biggest market should be "non Tamiya" drivers?

They will have shaft-driven 4WD buggy for those who prefer that. They have belt-driven buggy for those who prefer that.

They strip of the 201 all the expensive parts and release an entry level TRF 2WD to attracts beginners. Lower price, but upgradable.
Tamiyas success on the racetracks must be easy to relate to. If you have same car as Lee Martin, but with less option parts, it is still easy to do that.
The DB01<-->TRF501X is not same. You can never upgrade your DB01 to TRF specs. Close maybe, but still just close...

Wouldīnt be surprised if the 502X will be released as a "Basic" model too. Shaft-driven makes it easier for beginners.
Just some thoughts...
I totally agree Fredrik. These would be thoughts of a company. Why not share lots of parts have only low costs of development because things like suspension geometry, damper, general layout are already fixed and produce a car that is for all people who donīt like belt drive or race on very loose dirt tracks like mine here in Austria or many tracks in Australia or in New Zealand as some people wrote. Sure with the diff cover also a 511 can be racxe on dirt but without a doubt a shaft driven car is bulletproof in that case.
All people who race 4WD buggies either race belt driven or shaft driven cars. If you can offer both from one company you have at least the potential to influence 100% of buggy drivers.
Itīs just like VW, Skoda, Seat, Audi and partial Porsche. They share many same parts but are very different. Low costs for Audi but a much higher price in the end because of the big familiy. Seems Tamiya is doing similar things.
As for the jumping i drive a B44 at the moment and the Tamiya TRF502X will be very close to this. All i can say is that it jumps absolutely neutral. You can easily affect jumping so i donīt think the shaft drive along with another motor position will jump much different as the B44.
__________________
Xray XB4 ‚18
My showroom: http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom.asp?id=10777
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-09-2010
Smartalec's Avatar
Smartalec Smartalec is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,508
Default

Hopefully the 502 will just be an alternative to the 511 and not the successor as i'd see that as a backward step.

The 511, for me, has been a fantastic car this year and i'd hate to change to something that's not as good. We'll have to see how Lee and Co get on with it, trouble is, with his ability everything looks good LOL

From the picture it certainly looks like another B44/BJ4 clone, I know it says that it has the 511 proven suspension but surely the handling of the car is not all down to the suspension, a lot of it has to be down to weight distribution so I doubt it would run the same as the 511 with the motor on the opposite side and facing a different direction

I'm sure the quality of the car will be second to none and if it's proven to be as good or better than the 511 then we'll all jump at it.

I just hope that we're all given the choice and the 511 production continues
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-09-2010
kentech kentech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 175
Default

__________________
http://kentech.blogs.se
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 09-09-2010
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

Loving the BJ4 clone references.....

G
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 09-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northy View Post
Loving the BJ4 clone references.....

G
Yeah, it's odd, the suspension has been a clone all along, and once it's shaft drive it's difficult to not look similar, it's like people are complaining at the 502 being a clone when all the copying really went into the 501
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 09-09-2010
mattybucks mattybucks is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG28 View Post
Yeah, it's odd, the suspension has been a clone all along, and once it's shaft drive it's difficult to not look similar, it's like people are complaining at the 502 being a clone when all the copying really went into the 501
And the 201, at least Tamiya are copying decent cars and making them better 501, 201, 502.......... they've not tried to copy a cougar or cat yet I wonder why??
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 09-09-2010
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG28 View Post
Yeah, it's odd, the suspension has been a clone all along, and once it's shaft drive it's difficult to not look similar, it's like people are complaining at the 502 being a clone when all the copying really went into the 501
Indeed, the 501 was just a belt driven BJ4.....

G
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 09-09-2010
sosidge's Avatar
sosidge sosidge is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattybucks View Post
And the 201, at least Tamiya are decent cars and making them better 501, 201, 502.......... at least they've not tried to copy a cougar or cat!!!
You never know... if a Cougar or Cat had Tamiya build quality, they might turn out to be a decent car after all!
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 09-09-2010
TRF_AK's Avatar
TRF_AK TRF_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG28 View Post
Ah, so is the slipper they've announced just the current slipper but the new "base"'model won't come with a slipper as standard?
The slipper is listed as a hop-up for the TRF201 and new base 201, but no other details. They way it seems is that it is just the standard 201 slipper, but don't take that as set in stone yet.

I would expect it to be released in December/End of November.

As for another batch of 511s, I can tell you that Tamiya USA is getting another shipment in shortly.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 09-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF_AK View Post
The slipper is listed as a hop-up for the TRF201 and new base 201, but no other details. They way it seems is that it is just the standard 201 slipper, but don't take that as set in stone yet.

I would expect it to be released in December/End of November.

As for another batch of 511s, I can tell you that Tamiya USA is getting another shipment in shortly.
Good news, it's a class car so glad there's more available!

Is there a public anticipated release date for the 502 iris it still to be determined?
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 09-09-2010
JohnM's Avatar
JohnM JohnM is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 1,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northy View Post
Indeed, the 501 was just a belt driven BJ4.....

G
Or just a copy of Yokomo's BX
__________________
Model Junction, Boughton Raceway.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 09-09-2010
Smartalec's Avatar
Smartalec Smartalec is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,508
Default

Anyone planning on getting a 502 and wanting to rid themselves of a 511 please let me know as i'm looking for a spare
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 09-09-2010
Battle_axe's Avatar
Battle_axe Battle_axe is offline
Thieving scumbag
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bicester
Posts: 1,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mof View Post
I don't know if the pic is visible here (it is an attachment at rctech forums here).



About the Model
-Highly durable chassis consists of carbon fiber upper and lower decks and utilizes many aluminum
parts.
-Features an optimized weight distribution designed to match lightweight, block-shaped batteries.
-Shaft-driven 4WD system with the front-mid motor in a longitudinal position offers superb stability
and handling.
-Uses the TRF511’s proven suspension system.
-Kit also includes:
Front/Rear Carbon Fiber Damper Stays
Front/Rear Aluminum Suspension Mounts
Front/Rear Large Ball Differentials
Spur Gear with Built-In Slipper Clutch
Aeration Dampers
Front/Rear Universal Propeller Shafts
Full Ball Bearings
Why's this look like our x4proTE .
__________________
DO NOT BUY/SELL TO THIS USER.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 09-09-2010
bert digler's Avatar
bert digler bert digler is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 500yds from matty simpson
Posts: 1,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattybucks View Post
And the 201, at least Tamiya are copying decent cars and making them better 501, 201, 502.......... they've not tried to copy a cougar or cat yet I wonder why??
lol
__________________
who knows who cares
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-09-2010
TRF_AK's Avatar
TRF_AK TRF_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Default

More detail.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-09-2010
/tobys /tobys is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 1,370
Default

According to the CAD drawing, it's got the same kind of rubbish motor mount the B44 has
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 10-09-2010
nitrokillah's Avatar
nitrokillah nitrokillah is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BronxHells
Posts: 285
Default

i think this 502 looks Hot .

comparing it to a BJ4 / B44
Hahah. Come-on guys you gonna have to do better then that .

__________________
...THE UNTOUCHABLES...
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 10-09-2010
Gaz_Stanton's Avatar
Gaz_Stanton Gaz_Stanton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by /tobys View Post
According to the CAD drawing, it's got the same kind of rubbish motor mount the B44 has
Used to have...

http://www.m-k-racing.com/product_in...oducts_id=7853
__________________
Gareth Stanton
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com