Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Mardave

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

Thanks Richard
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-12-2011
Gazza's Avatar
Gazza Gazza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 160
Default

So which rules we running to now then


MARDAVE V12 BRCA CIRCUIT RULES
2010 / 2011
V12 BRCA Mardave Circuit Rules

General Rules and Regulations 2011/12. These General Rules for Year


V12 Circuit Construction Rules

CHASSIS AND COMPONENTS

1. Cars to be standard 1/12th scale Mardave V12 chassis and suspension.

No composite chassis allowed.. . PMSL
2. Ball races allowed on Front & Rear axle. Rear axle and spur gear either
32dp or 48dp . Diffs are allowed.



Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-12-2011
TOMO WEF's Avatar
TOMO WEF TOMO WEF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Erm grp is a composite!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

moved from site by myself
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-12-2011
TOMO WEF's Avatar
TOMO WEF TOMO WEF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Yep the car of gazza's I drove was great. It was much punchier and quicker than my own 13.5 1s car, not sure what speedo / motor combo it was but it flew.

The car was definitely better than my own in the corners. However there was an issue going into the fast hairpin where it would almost handbrake it's way round the bend either due to the chassis sides catching the floor under heavy load or the speedo neutral brakes being set too high. (Gazza later fitted harder rear springs to control the excessive lateral movement however I didn't drive it after this).

Most importantly though I am yet to drive the Mardave grp or carbon car so cannot comment as to which one I think is best or which is faster.

I do commend anyone who has a passion and works to make something new but there is such a thing as right place right timing with everything.
So in short we all love daves and we should just all remember that and get as many guys trackside as possible and sort the problems out after if there is any.
Just my view guys.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-12-2011
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default

Paul,thank you for your posts, they are most informative. Just a couple of points...

12th have had the same design for over 25 years - including a carbon chassis. The materials might have changed a bit in some parts (Ti rods, etc.) but otherwise the carbon 12L from 1987 on my shelf is the same as the 2012 RC12R5.1 I will be running. So, just what is the problem with a class that doesn't change?

Based on the attitude and approach in your posts, I know now which kit to buy if I want to race this class. Thanks for the information.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

Glad to be of help:thumb sup:
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

removed by author
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-12-2011
Aaron w Aaron w is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 59
Default

So, what chassis won today?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-12-2011
Karl Dransfield's Avatar
Karl Dransfield Karl Dransfield is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron w View Post
So, what chassis won today?
1st - new mardave carbon chassis
2nd - mardave ce chassis
3rd - mardave alloy chassis
__________________
Mardave - RCbearings uk - Kamtec
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 04-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

Wrong karl 2nd place went to james with a copy of our wings on it you seem to have forgot that mate!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-12-2011
Aaron w Aaron w is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 59
Default

You win Karl? You got a mardave chassis?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-12-2011
Karl Dransfield's Avatar
Karl Dransfield Karl Dransfield is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulnuneaton View Post
Wrong karl 2nd place went to james with a copy of our wings on it you seem to have forgot that mate!!!!!!!
That was on his other car Paul. He ran the standard ce chassis after the 1st quali. However I tried the LB racing under tray which is a similar concept to the p2 in practice and it produced significantly more rear downforce. The only problem was it scuffing on the ground. But this will be sorted
__________________
Mardave - RCbearings uk - Kamtec
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-12-2011
Karl Dransfield's Avatar
Karl Dransfield Karl Dransfield is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron w View Post
You win Karl? You got a mardave chassis?
Yeah I was running the new carbon chassis. Much stiffer than the fibreglass one. The car is much more predictable and changes direction quicker. The carbon chassis is definitely the way to go.
__________________
Mardave - RCbearings uk - Kamtec
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-12-2011
Aaron w Aaron w is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 59
Default

I'm waiting for one from Chris. I ran the fibre glass one on Friday. Had loads of steering. Just a bit lazy in a fast chicane. Need the cf one.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 05-12-2011
Gazza's Avatar
Gazza Gazza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 160
Default

Yes was a good day even tho I was down on power and still not sure why my car was so slow i cant put my finger on it it started off ok and as the day went on it got slower and slower an for the life of me I have no Idea why

I was upset as it was flying the last two meetings and today I could not keep up with James no matter what I did the chassis was superb cant fault it . . .so its down to 3 things now

1 Motor
2 ESC
3 Lipo
Some testing on tuesday me thinks I have to find out whay other wise Tamwoth is out for me

But dont go carbon go GRP. . which ever chassis you go fo Carbon is way to much for what it is and wont last long with some Dave drivers
Also there was no differance in the Carbon chassis as it was still on pace with James's Mardave Ce GRP standard one save ya money go GRP

Yes you all seem to know what the wings do know
I can bet there will be a few more poping up soon even Karl likes the idea as it sucks the car down
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

removed by author
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-12-2011
Gazza's Avatar
Gazza Gazza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 160
Default

Yes its a shame mine was down on power I was so gutted other wise would have been good fun . . but hey thats racing

Also on a good note . . .

Two Phone calls this morning with people wanting to make our Wing Chassis . . .

well Ill keep you all posted
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-12-2011
Paulnuneaton's Avatar
Paulnuneaton Paulnuneaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 467
Default

removed by myself
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-12-2011
Karl Dransfield's Avatar
Karl Dransfield Karl Dransfield is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazza View Post

But dont go carbon go GRP. . which ever chassis you go fo Carbon is way to much for what it is and wont last long with some Dave drivers
GRP has far too much flex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazza View Post

Also there was no differance in the Carbon chassis as it was still on pace with James's Mardave Ce GRP standard one save ya money go GRP
the carbon one was 4/10ths of a second faster per lap



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazza View Post
I can bet there will be a few more poping up soon even Karl likes the idea as it sucks the car down
But yeah the LB racing undertray (wings) did yield more downforce.
__________________
Mardave - RCbearings uk - Kamtec
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com