Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Yokomo

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2006
Bastos Bastos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
Default Just a movie

Hello,


Just Billy Easton running the MR4 BX,...,here

www.rcracingvm.com

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2006
Marco's Avatar
Marco Marco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in the Outskirts of Zürich-city, Switzerland
Posts: 47
Default

WoW!

Its very fast, i wonder what motor and esc and batteries he's running there.

greets Marco
__________________
2x xxx-BK, xx4-we, 2x MR4-BX, TC3
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2006
Bathy Bathy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bath
Posts: 501
Default

That's no normal BX huh, on his car the rear belt is under the rear brace... It's not like that on my BX!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2006
Chaz's Avatar
Chaz Chaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
Default

Wow, that is one nice off-road track, that makes me wanna race off-road

Chaz
__________________
Nemo Racing | Spire Model Distribution | Turnip paint
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2006
Marco's Avatar
Marco Marco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in the Outskirts of Zürich-city, Switzerland
Posts: 47
Default

I really wonder how he got his rear belt under that brace, and why should it be better?
__________________
2x xxx-BK, xx4-we, 2x MR4-BX, TC3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-08-2006
Bastos Bastos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
Default

I think the position of the rear brace is "logic"...(ones of billy)

The brace , I think, is too much closer to the chassis... in case of "strong" flexion,..., it could brake ( I ever break this brace ) because the brace got the same flexion of the chassis
Better if the brace is higher.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-08-2006
Marco's Avatar
Marco Marco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in the Outskirts of Zürich-city, Switzerland
Posts: 47
Default

would be interesting to see Details of that Mod
__________________
2x xxx-BK, xx4-we, 2x MR4-BX, TC3
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-08-2006
waldiman waldiman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Default

If you look closely you will see that he mounts the self made rear upper deck NOT to the shock tower base, but to the rear bulkhead (BX-302RL and BX-302RR). Doing so the upper deck moves higher (with the help of some bushings in the front and rear) and the belt is entirely under the deck. You can see these bushings in the front (silver) quite easily at the end of the video.

I mounted a stiffer rear shock tower on the BX after a crash landing. After that the shock tower didn't break any longer, but the rear upper deck started to break (not once but n-times ). Actually the BX is the first car I ever had which breaks the upper deck quite easily. The good thing is that Billy Easton seems to have experienced the same problem . The reason seems to be that the impulse of a crash landing is directly moved forward from the shock tower to the tower base and finally to the upper deck, which might break if the shock tower did not (as Bastos already mentioned). With this mod the impulse which goes into the upper deck is reduced since the flex of the bulkheads should be less than the flex of the tower base...

Hope someone understands what I mean (english is not my mother tongue)?!

Cheers,
Jens

Last edited by waldiman; 23-08-2006 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com