|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
GHEA pistons (which way up!)
This is probably a daft question but just got some GHEA pistons for my B44.1, which way do they go in tappered side up or down?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
tapered side down
__________________
CML DISTRIBUTION -SOUTHWESTRC -HPI - RUDEBITS - MR O FOAMS - LMR - ATOMIC CARBON -STARREGORSEHOLIDAYPARK - ICON RC
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Either way...
__________________
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If I understand it right the spring absorbs the bump and it is the job of a damper to control the return. If a faster return was better then surely no damper would be 'best'.
I too understood (and read somewhere) that it doesn't matter which way up they go. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
then you understand it wrong...
The damper works in both directions and its task is to dampen the movement/oscillations you would get if you had only a spring. The Ghea piston is designed so that you have a slightly different damping rate in each direction. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
You also understand it wrong grelland
Cause they cannot return faster cause that's impossible! They are linear in or out Cheers
__________________
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
This has been done to death previously, and the man himself (ghea) confirms from testing that rebel is correct..
http://www.oople.com/forums/showthre...830#post465830 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Cheers Dazzler
__________________
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Don't get me wrong, they defo make a difference but just not in the way people are stateing
Not sure what it is though! Lol
__________________
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The taper is down to keep the piston from hydro-locking against the shock body when fully extended . By hydro-locking I mean temporaraly stuck to shock bottom. The taper leaves a little oil between the piston and shock. It makes for a smoother ride.
__________________
SHUMACHER CAT SX SHUMACHER COUGAR SV |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Moth you are wrong ! Read the link above cheers
That already been suggested
__________________
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Hehe, this has been fascinating.
So, that cleared up, what would be wrong with a shocker that had 'no' damping in upward wheel travel and only damped on downward travel? An extending spring with no damping would cause a chassis to bounce after a bump so there is clearly a case for damping in that direction but why damp the other way? Surely a wheel can move more fully up a bump with less damping, no? For the purposes of an answer let's remove cornering from the equation. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
The only reliable way of getting two stage damping on a 1/10th is to valve the piston like Richard weatherley did with the pred years ago.
I have problem with Ghea and their excellent products and yes machined (not moulded) pistons are a great idea in my opinion and do make a difference in a good way. And their service and information is great Would be nice to see people trying the valve method as it defo makes for a quicker return with pack as desired
__________________
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
So, is that the universal desire then, more damping piston going in than going out?
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Thank god for you being right
__________________
SHUMACHER CAT SX SHUMACHER COUGAR SV |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Thank god I was right about some thing once! And I am not letting go of it. Lol cheers
__________________
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
can we get a graph of tapered vs non tapered dyno test to see why they work?
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
At least I was right when I said the previous poster was wrong |
|
|