|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Orange RX - DSM/DSM2 compatiblity
hi guys , have a 3vc with an original spektrum dsm module in it. does anyone know if the orange rx receivers work with this module?
cheers!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
They are only compatable with dsm2, I found out the hard way
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thanks mate!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
If you get an orange module they are fine or a futaba spectrum module for the aircraft transmitters
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
i have a 3vc will the orange module defo work with that?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I tried a orange module in my 3vcs with these receivers
module would not bind with receiver I phone place I bought it from and was told problem they know about but no answer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
thanks mate,
although the 3vc and 3vcs are different but if it doesnt work on the 3vcs it most definately wont work on the 3vc. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
i have all options !!
im fairly sure spektrum have different protocol for air or surface DSM i know the orange GR300 works on DSM2 cos i have a dx3c but it wont work with an early DX3s that only has DSM not DSM2 i will try with orange module and spekky air module but i think ive tried it before and failed fid |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
orange reciever
I have a dx4s transmitter and have managed to bind 1 orange receiver, however after updating firmware for transmitter i am now unable to bind any new orange receivers, the orange receiver bound before upgrade still works though.
__________________
Xray XB9 Xray xb4 2014 Dex 210 Dex 410r Kyosho MP6E Kyosho RB6 Schumacher Cougar SV2 Radio Control News Facebook page click link M B MODELS |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
, imagine if they didn't
__________________
o0ple Trader Feedback NE Venue's New & Old my space on YouTube CFR RCTV Channel Glenn Atterton BRCA 2005 1/10th Off-Road Veterans Champion LMP12 National Champion 2003/2004 / F3 class |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Some expensive shizzle happening right there
__________________
Answer RC SWorkz 35-3 SWorkz 350T SWorkz S12-2 Instagram: crazylthirteen Blogger: http://the-croucher.blogspot.co.uk/ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Daft question why? If remember correctly futaba made no distinct ion between air and surface 2.4 sets originally it was just FASST . I will of course make the usual proviso that I, m completely happy to be proved wrong and im so old I csnt remember anything for longer than 6 month's
I thought the idea of 2.4 was to eliminate the idea that the pilot/driver would have remember to shout/ask what anyone else was using kind regards Fid |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|