|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On one side we have common sense, majority decision, and what's best for racing. On the other side we have a technicality that doesn't even effect the track and no one actually seems to have a problem with from a racing point of view It's not a hard decision! What happens if we just went ahead and ran the race? I don't think anyone on here is actually against using the track. |
#82
|
||||
|
||||
You can't run a national round if its not sanctioned by the RCCAOI. Racing will go ahead at the Naul anyway, forget about it.
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
Just back from the nationals and getting the piss taken out of me all weekend about the farce that is the rccaoi.!!!!!
Big thanks to all involed.. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry you had to endure all that when it is no fault of yours
I hope you were able to enjoy your racing anyway |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
A newsletter has been sent to all DMCC members re RCCAOI round 1
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Graham sent around a timeline of events. Here's a complaint that was sent to the 1:10th rep. Now, we know the rule is 2.4 and nothing can be done, but really, does anyone that has raced on the track agree with it any of it?
Quote:
Do fast drivers need the extra 30cm? I would have thought that the good drivers stick to the racing line, they don't need the track to be wider. |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
I've seen 5Th scale touring car cleanly overtake in less space than 2m
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
My favourite bit is "It also isn’t fair to the clubs that considered the application form and decided that they could not make the minimum requirements and didn;t apply. How does it look if the first round doesn’t make these requirements?"
LOL, yes, clearly the complaint is just looking out for all those other clubs that were going to apply! Joke of a complaint imho, and racewayone had a cheek to come on looking for thanks for their facebook page (for the latest story that they cut and paste from somewhere else ) when it's them putting in bullshít complaints. No wonder they refuse to post in this thread. If that website thinks the complaint is somehow helping racing in ireland, they're deluded. |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
How can a complaint be accepted by the rccaoi rep if you are not a member of said association???
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
????
__________________
Trader Feedback: http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75866 |
#91
|
||||
|
||||
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
???? I question the statement Kartstuffer. If a non-member cannot make a complaint (even though they are a member in this case, check drivers list) does that statement not work both ways. As 99% of the posters to this thread are not-members for 2013 why should anyone have a say at this point. I think you guys need to leave this to your Club committee to discuss and stop posting stuff up and making comments on Oople.
__________________
Trader Feedback: http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75866 |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This pettiness was not started by the DMCC who operate the only 1/10th off road track in Ireland. As for commenting on Oople why not let the truth come out and see how people feel about the situation instead of trying to hide it all behind closed doors. |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
As for not being a member of the rccaoi ,I was last year but have ABSOLUTELY no intention of joining this year along with many others as long as this farcical situation remains.
This has no reflection on the secretary who has done all he could to accommodate the DMCC. |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
DMCC would like to remind all drivers that we will be hosting racing as normal on the day that was scheduled for the National Round 1, and anyone who had planned to attend is more than welcome to come and race with us on June 9th, or any other Sunday or Wednesday evening.
Below is our 2M/2.7M track, with a car on it for scale... Im sure most quick drivers can over take on it |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|