View Single Post
  #20  
Old 13-05-2011
TheReferee's Avatar
TheReferee TheReferee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RudeTony View Post
I think when you evaluate you have to look at a lower ability rather than look at Bradder winning at RHR. He probably would of won anyways as he was right up there last year there and doesn't exacly go slow with his standard B4, as proven by winning the Petit race!
I don't agree the C4.1 is proven anything.
I got 22nd at the first National with my Kyosho Vega and I was dissapointed.
Please don't misunderstand - the C4.1 looks good but the Vega is Great
tony
you have a point and i am sure all 4 c4.1 drivers would have been in the high finals irrespective of the chassis they used, had this thread been about the kyosho vega then yes it goes well, but we are talking about a B4 conversion, the front end/gearbox internals/shocks are completely different. in effect we are talking about two completely different cars. you can base an opinion that as they share the common chassis and other parts that if the kyosho vega is good then the B4 vega should also be good. but you know the difference even a small change can make to a cars handling and general driveability, it could be that the b4 vega is actually better than it kyosho sister of course the opposite could be true.

john
__________________
John Cockill
BRCA 1/10 OFF ROAD HEAD REFEREE
Reply With Quote