Quote:
Originally Posted by SOSx
Again completely both missing the point and getting it at the same time   |
I'm sorry I'm boring you with my logic, but i stress again that this information has too many variables to be of use. Lets think about this for a second.
You want to know if a durango 210 is the best car to drive on carpet for example?
It isnt, and is at the same time. At my club I'm one of 3 people who runs a durango. I suck. The car setup has been done by a durango team driver, and I still suck. The team driver could put that same car first or second without issue ever single time he raced it. You want to exclude the results of the team driver because they may sway the results. So according to your criteria from my club, the 210 is a "bad" car. This is untrue, clearly.
There are too many variables, and yes honestly you are wasting your time utterly in trying to collect this data as the skew is too great when you remove the pro drivers.
I'll save you a shitload of time and a shitload of effort.
Buy a B44.2 and a C4.2 conversion for a B4.2 so the extra bits you can use to make a B4.2.
Thats every single type of useful car for someone who isn't winning national A finals, if you cant make those cars work, then clearly your PEBTAR...