Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Tamiya

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30-10-2010
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default 54263 TRF201 high traction lower deck

Anyone seen this recently released part and know what surface it's designed for using on, or is it just a replacement STD chassis ?
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-10-2010
tony6187's Avatar
tony6187 tony6187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DUBLIN
Posts: 400
Default

spotted this myself and was wondering.according to randy caster over on rc tech its a more flexible chassis for low grip conditions compared to a standard chassis.dont know how much use it will be on grass/astro until its been tried i guess
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-10-2010
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

It is reinforced, but will have more flex?
Tamiya says "polyurethane-glass reinforced lower deck will provide your chassis with superior pitch and chassis roll rigidity which will lead to improved handling, traction, and suspension effects".

As you may also have seen, they will release new motor plate 54276, that is 2.5 grams lighter than std and also have "protrusion to allow for an improved attachment with the motor cover and protection against dust"
New reinforced front suspension arms too (#54265).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-10-2010
marco NL's Avatar
marco NL marco NL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nederland
Posts: 642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich D View Post
Anyone seen this recently released part and know what surface it's designed for using on, or is it just a replacement STD chassis ?
hi Richard

http://cgi.ebay.nl/OP1263-Tamiya-TRF...item5640997a61
__________________
TRF502 TRF511 TRF201XMW
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-10-2010
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Hi Guys, yeah i have seen them on Ebay, just had no idea how they differed from the std chassis thats all. Im still none the wiser - Reinforced doesnt usually mean more flexible !
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-10-2010
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

@Rich: Good, so it makes 2 of us then.

I think it is stiffer and heavier than the original chassi.
Ebay item says "helps enhance torsional rigidity" too so.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2010
TRF_AK's Avatar
TRF_AK TRF_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Default

The new deck has MORE traction than the stock deck. More flexible.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

I'm well confused by this too, so it's stronger but softer?? What is it, the 201 Andrex chassis??

Good call on the motor plate though, the standard one is very hard to seal the cover against!!
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2010
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

I´m also confused. Reinforced, helps enhance torsional rigidity but still more flex?
Ok...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-11-2010
MattADH MattADH is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,038
Default

I have one and I am sure that its stiffer than the kit version...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-11-2010
sosidge's Avatar
sosidge sosidge is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik Emilsson View Post
It is reinforced, but will have more flex?
Tamiya says "polyurethane-glass reinforced lower deck will provide your chassis with superior pitch and chassis roll rigidity which will lead to improved handling, traction, and suspension effects".

As you may also have seen, they will release new motor plate 54276, that is 2.5 grams lighter than std and also have "protrusion to allow for an improved attachment with the motor cover and protection against dust"
New reinforced front suspension arms too (#54265).
This is what Tamiya use for the "softer" plastics on the high-end cars. I assume the standard chassis has the carbon reinforcement? Usually they mark the moulding somewhere with an arrow pointing to "cf" or "gf".
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-11-2010
Dyna's Avatar
Dyna Dyna is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mid Wales
Posts: 770
Default

Could this new optional chassis be the standard chassis for the ' 58477 Tamiya Zahhak - DN01 ' the downgraded TRF201 ? They both seem to have appeared at roughly the same time ?

If so, it might make sense they put a slightly more forgiving chassis on the entry level car and release it as a tuning option for the higher-spec TRF201 ?

If it is stiffer than the TRF201 chassis though, that's my theory blown out of the water :P
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-11-2010
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sosidge View Post
This is what Tamiya use for the "softer" plastics on the high-end cars. I assume the standard chassis has the carbon reinforcement? Usually they mark the moulding somewhere with an arrow pointing to "cf" or "gf".
Yeah, already checked. Standard chassi is marked gf so...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-11-2010
MattADH MattADH is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,038
Default

Arrow points to PU on the new chassis...

When you put them next to each other, the High-Traction chassis is more black than the standard one.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-11-2010
Smartalec's Avatar
Smartalec Smartalec is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,508
Default

Anyone know when the motor plate will be available?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-11-2010
sosidge's Avatar
sosidge sosidge is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,774
Default

PU would surely mean unreinforced... it's the same marking they put on the bumper trees. I would expect that to be softer than the kit chassis, but I don't have either in front of me!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-11-2010
TRF_AK's Avatar
TRF_AK TRF_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Default

The language barrier is what leads to the "reinforced" confusion. When translating the original Japanese to English, this type of thing can happen.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-11-2010
Fabs Fabs is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Default

It says High Traction not reinforced. And remember the TRF511 arms are high traction compared to the TRF501X, meaning the PROVIDE more traction as they're more flexible.

Just my €0.02
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-11-2010
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabs View Post
It says High Traction not reinforced. And remember the TRF511 arms are high traction compared to the TRF501X, meaning the PROVIDE more traction as they're more flexible.

Just my €0.02
Good point mate !

Cheers for input guys, i guess its debatable whether mere mortals will notice any difference between chassis ?? I must admit, i have used high traction arms on my 511 all season and switched to 501x tougher versions last time out. Noticed no difference in grip levels.
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-11-2010
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

Think it is funny though that Tamiyausa call it Reinforced Lower Deck, not high traction...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com