|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
So, the final answer is that the new chassis is softer or more flexible?
__________________
Tamiya America - Trakpower - 92Zero Designs |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
From what i have read on the forum over the past 18 months or so, this guys information is pretty much always 100% reliable
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah....about that...... it will be changed tomorrow . Tamiya Inc originally called it reinforced, and then it was changed to high traction during production.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Ok, but don´t let it happen again...
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Hello,
There is a difference of weight between the 2 chassis - The hight traction is about 25g heavier than the standart one. But on the hands, the higt traction one seems to have less flex. Didnt try on the track. Is someone have an idea of the differnec between the 2 chassis but on the track ? Thank |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I know someone who has been running the chassis here in the US on a med to high bite track and he said he didnt notice any real difference but is going to do some more testing.
__________________
Steve Butts Team Durango USA, AKA Racing, Speed Passion USA,Racers Edge, Savox, TrackStar RC |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
anyway, has anyone tested the high traction arms as well? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
edit......... NO, the dn01 chassis is the original 201x chassis and not the high traction one. http://www.tamiya.com/english/rc/rcmanual/dn01.pdf |
|
|